A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion

A Natural History of Rape Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion A biologist and an anthropologist use evolutionary biology to explain the causes and inform the prevention of rape In this controversial book Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer use evolutionary biology

  • Title: A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion
  • Author: Randy Thornhill Craig T. Palmer
  • ISBN: 9780262700832
  • Page: 145
  • Format: Paperback
  • A biologist and an anthropologist use evolutionary biology to explain the causes and inform the prevention of rape.In this controversial book, Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer use evolutionary biology to explain the causes of rape and to recommend new approaches to its prevention According to Thornhill and Palmer, evolved adaptation of some sort gives rise to rape the maA biologist and an anthropologist use evolutionary biology to explain the causes and inform the prevention of rape.In this controversial book, Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer use evolutionary biology to explain the causes of rape and to recommend new approaches to its prevention According to Thornhill and Palmer, evolved adaptation of some sort gives rise to rape the main evolutionary question is whether rape is an adaptation itself or a by product of other adaptations Thornhill and Palmer address, and claim to demolish scientifically, many myths about rape bred by social science theory over the past 25 years The popular contention that rapists are not motivated by sexual desire is, they argue, scientifically inaccurate The book also includes a useful summary of evolutionary theory and a comparison of evolutionary biology s and social science s explanations of human behavior.

    One thought on “A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion”

    1. Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer's A Natural History of Rape represents the worst excesses of evolutionary psychology. Contra the authors framing of the controversy, the book was critically panned in scientific journals and resulted in a book-length response edited by Cheryl Brown Travis, Evolution, Gender, and Rape. (Elisabeth Lloyd's excellent chapter is available online: joelvelasco/teaching/2890/)Thornhill and Palmer argue that rape is either an adaptive behavior or the by-product of adaptat [...]

    2. Frequently a catchall term for critiquing feminist writing as 'too emotional' or vehement to absorb, strident is an accurate description of Palmer and Thornhill's argument that rape is a product of reproductive adaptations, not the violent result of a misogynist culture as suggested in feminist thought. Their rhetoric is quite overwhelming, so much so that I almost bought their pre-emptive defence of a lack of data showing the reproductive success of rape as a ridiculous expectation, even as a l [...]

    3. This is the most outrageously offensive and wildly unfounded book I have ever read - on any subject - but particularly on rape, as it is essentially trying to provide a 'scientific' basis for popular rape myths. I am a rape theorist myself, and have read the countless legitimate studies - in anthropology, sociology etc - that conclusively refute the myths Thornhill takes for granted, such as that women provoke rape by wearing revealing clothing etc (although statistically, unattractive, modestly [...]

    4. In their repeated attempt to rationalize and justify rape, Thornhill and Palmer spend the whole book trying to tell you that they are not trying to rationalize or justify rape. I read this and shook my head in anger the whole time. I thought maybe I would get some insight into one of the most terrifying experiences anyone can have. I thought perhaps I'd hear another side of the story, one that we don't hear very often. I was disappointed.

    5. "The ability of ideology to blind people to the utter implausibility of their positions is perhaps the greatest threat to accumulating the knowledge necessary to solve social problems." (p. 152)This book uses a ton of data/research in evolutionary psychology/biology to explain why rape exists in all human societies.It has been panned by a lot of people as somehow justifying or rationalizing rape, which is not the case at all. Those who hate this book (and the research behind it) fall victim to t [...]

    6. Not particularly well written. Logical holes and gaps that you could drive a truck through. Way too defensive about feminists and social scientists. Not nearly enough data. Not a chart or graph in the whole book. But probably correct in most of the conclusions. Feminists have said so many goofy things in the last fifty years that refuting them is a lot like taking on a baby in a cage fight. The audience is going to hate you, just because you look so mean. The thing that really grates in this boo [...]

    7. Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer's Natural History of Rape argues that rape is continuous with but nonetheless an extreme form of male sexual behavior in human beings. You could think of male sexuality in humans as a dial that could either be 0, asexual, or 10, rapacious, and perhaps normal male sexuality falls somewhere in between, at a 4 or a 5. Something like this claim looks to be true, and it would look as though from our point of view as human beings, most animal behavior, were humans to e [...]

    8. This is a very insightful book about the evolutionary history of human sexuality, specifically in regards to sexual conflicts of interest, namely rape. Considering the inflammatory nature of this subject matter, the authors make a great effort to clearly define and explain the evolutionary theory and interaction of biology and environment that results in modern human sexuality. The precision and intricacy of their analysis is necessary to avoid any oversimplifications or misunderstandings that c [...]

    9. Gives more questions than answers, but I found what is known to be really fascinating. They do a good job throughout of not being sexist, until the chapter on how to educate people not to rape. They say girls should be educated more about not being raped - fine - but spend more than twice as many pages on that than on telling boys not to rape. Besides that, awesome.

    10. I'd read this book when it first came out, but I'd be curious to read it again in the new edition (comments in response to criticism?) and after having just read Sex at Dawn, which maybe/maybe not covers similar territory with a different aim. It maybe be even shittier now than it was then! We'll see.

    11. I am not someone who will give up on a book easily, but this book is just so uninteresting, considering the lack of proof the majority of the time, that I decided to return it to the library soon. Maybe I will check it out again sometime but for now I'm beyond frustrated with it and ready to move on to something new.

    12. I briefly joined a book club @ UT. A few high-minded profs and their grad assistants were reading this. Heavynda boring, but heavy.

    13. I found the book very enlightening. Ultimately, the truth of the arguments put forward here must survive the test of science, not ideology or political correctness.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *